As the title suggests, so forth.
Gotham Inc.: Warner Brothers and their intellectual property – Part II
Warner Bros is preoccupied right now with trying, via casting announcements, to stoke excitement for their relaunch of the DCEU. (Not helped by Matthew Vaughn wondering aloud what director would be happy to have their Supergirl cast for them) But the clock is literally ticking. This is 2024 – Superman and Lois Lane will enter the public domain in 2034. They will be followed by Batman in 2035, the Joker in 2036, and the final member of the DC Trinity, Wonder Woman, in 2037. That bears repeating – in ten years anybody with an iPhone and a Halloween Supes costume can make and release their own Superman movie, and there is not a damn thing that the WB can do to stop them. A Variety article discussing the upshot of this legal cliffhanger saw trademarks as an obstacle to marketing, and also noted that certain elements would remain out of touch for longer. (So my idea for a Superman movie goes on the back burner for an additional five years until kryptonite is available) That article also blithely suggested that quality control would prevent the emergence of rival cinematic Supermen. Which struck me as unintentionally funny. Zack Snyder had Superman murder Zod, with the neck snap heard around the world. If Jon Favreau was to direct a knock off Superman movie in which Kal-El imprisoned Zod in the Phantom Zone, which of these cinematic Supermen would be the one that was the true keeper of the flame? Because in truth these characters should be in the public domain because they are, in part, public creations at this time. It’s not just Jason Todd that died by popular vote, audiences also effectively downvoted the 1990s filmic Batman. And, indeed, despite much protestation by some loud voices, they delivered the same thumbs down to the Snyderverse. When audiences can dictate what happens to characters aren’t they starting to flex their muscles as co-creators of the current iteration? Also, by 2034 who knows how far AI and CGI might have advanced? Perhaps the dream of 1930s Bat-movies will be attainable once the Gable estate comes round to the idea.
Maestro and histrionic conducting
“What do I do? I play the orchestra” – Jobs to the Woz, Steve Jobs
I was taken aback at the big bow wow finale of Maestro, with Bradley Cooper practically bent backwards, eyes closed – ‘conducting’ the orchestra in Mahler’s second symphony. The damndest thing is that it accurately captures how Leonard Bernstein conducted that piece on that occasion in Ely Cathedral. Performing the part of the conductor rather than just conducting. It reminded me of the unintentionally funny egomania that eventually saw Herbert von Karajan insist all footage of the Berliner Philharmoniker should include him. I find such histrionics desperately insecure and lament their legacy in gurning conductors of the moment. At a recent concert in the front row I was astonished to hear a swooshing sound was the conductor’s grimaces and exhortations to the musicians. This is conducting that draws attention to itself. And it’s not necessary to get the job done. Karina Canellakis is noticeably controlled on the podium. And then there is the Zen stillness of the conductor of this performance of the Oppenheimer score; which one would’ve thought a godsend for huffing and puffing. If it’s more important to be seen doing the job very hard than actually doing the job well then have at it. After all this is a perfect match: if Cooper wins the Best Actor Oscar it will be because he hammered us all over the head with how hard he was trying to win an Oscar for this damn performance.